Issue No 8, Sept 9-15, 2002 | ISSN:1684-2075 | satribune.com


Complete Story

How Politically Motivated Decisions Caused Loss of Hundreds of Millions to Investors

Special SAT Report

ISLAMABAD: Economic managers of Pakistan have been using all kinds of gimmicks to present a very bright picture of the country’s economy to the people and SA Tribune has caught them red handed in the middle of one such trick --- artificially propping up the Stock Market--- which caused losses of hundreds of millions of rupees to the tax payers and investors.

Documents now available reveal that shortly before the cataclysmic events of Sept 11, the economic managers were under so much pressure that they were forced to use all means, fair or foul, to present a rosy picture of their performance.

Since the Stock Market was an easily identifiable barometer of the health of the economy, they secretly decided to boost it by forcing government owned financial institutions and funds to allocate a certain percentage for investment in the capital market, irrespective of whether this public money promised any dividends or not.

These clever managers did not take this decision themselves but involved General Pervez Musharraf, as Chief Executive. Being an army man who knew very little about these economic gimmicks, General Musharraf was on, August 13, 2001, made to preside over a meeting of these government institutions, including State Life Insurance (SLIC), National Investment Trust (NIT), National Bank (NBL), Habib Bank (HBL) and Employees Old Age Benefit Institution (EOBI) and a highly controversial decision to create a Rs. 3 billion (over US$ 50 million) fund for pumping it into the Stock Market was taken.

While some banks and SLIC tried to keep the newly created fund under their own control, contrary to a “professional Fund Manager” promised at the meeting, EOBI, which was under the late Labour Minister, Omar Asghar Khan, was tagged with the NBL. EOBI was asked to contribute Rs 1.7 billion from its Rs 40 billion portfolio of pension funds. View Letter of Labour Ministry Page1 | Page2

All these financial bodies keep people’s money in shape of investments in policies, fixed deposits and other financial instruments. EOBI carries pension funds of workers. The managers of these funds are supposed to invest this money in secure avenues to ensure that a dividend is paid in time and no losses are incurred. The government order to pump in a huge amount in the Stock Exchange, when growth was declining and the market was almost dead, was a recipe for a total disaster at the expense of the depositors.

EOBI Board of Trustees made some angry noises but no one listened to them as none could stand up to the military government's decision. But at least Omar Asghar Khan, in sheer desperation and anger, brought their views on the record in the files. “The Board of Trustees were of the opinion that the pension funds of the workers should only be invested in the least risky investments, whereas, the investment in Stock Market is volatile, speculative and unpredictable,” he noted in the letter to the Finance Minister.

The President of the Board of Trustees, the senior most bureaucrat of the Labour Ministry, tried to explain that every care would be taken not to incur losses, but a majority of the Board member rejected the proposal to invest in the Stock Market. No one, however, listened.

By October 2001, the EOBI had been forced to pump in over Rs 115 million in the Stock Exchange although its Chairman kept on trying to persuade the Finance Ministry that the target of Rs 1.7 billion was too high and EOBI had no available cash to invest as most of its funds were already invested in various securities and bonds.

On October 25, 2001, the Chairman, who is also the Labour Secretary, sent a signed letter to the Finance Ministry seeking lowering of the target to Rs 500 million from Rs 1.7 billion. View Letter Page1 | Page2

Millions of rupees were artificially sunk by other financial institutions in the Stock Exchange, under government orders, but as expected, the market did not move because of the underlying weakness in the economy.

The economic managers thus caused losses to the tune of hundreds of millions and ultimately the investors and the tax payers had to pay for these politically motivated decisions.

Email story  Email Story | Discuss story Discuss Story

Back to top

 

This Site Is

Innovesia

 

Copyright © 2002 South Asia Tribune Publications, L.L.C. All rights reserved.