Issue No 7, Sep 2-8, 2002 | ISSN:1684-2075 | satribune.com


Opinion

Pakistan: Makings of Police State?

Dr. Zafar Altaf

THE much-trumpeted new police ordinance is finally out and so is the police, to kill innocent civilians of this country, as first in Islamabad's Sector D-12 and now in Khanewal at the infamous military farms!

Before we discuss it here, I am reminded of Robert Peel who gave England its police force. Then the idea was to maintain not only harmony in society but also to check the rule of wanton authority. To the subcontinent it gave nothing more than a police force that could use its authority for the perpetuation of state power. The rights of people mattered little to them. The harmony required for a social system to develop was not their objective. The police constable had the right to arrest any one under section 54 of the Criminal Procedure Code on the sole reason of suspicion.

There were safeguards that were provided. The Army was monitored under the Army Act. It was inconceivable that the white man be tried in any way by the natives. Even to this day the rule stands and in fact the army personnel are not prosecuted under the local and national laws. But the Army Act had one saving grace. It was that the court martial was always swift and speedy.

The white man may not have been tried but when a principle was violated the incumbent was usually sent home in disgrace [Chief Justice Young of the Lahore High Court was recalled by the Privy Council for sitting on judgment in his own cause].

Pakistan inherited a policing system that was given to a culture of excessive power orientation. The colonialists did build a system of checks and balance and the police came under the control of the District Magistrates, who in turn were answerable to the High Courts under the rules thus formulated. All these rules came into force in the mid 19th century. Public peace and public interest were supreme with the police. Both tallied with the government in power. What was public interest depended on the government in power.

The colonial powers never had to use the police force to perpetuate themselves in power because the Viceroy and his cabinet were never up for elections of any kind. All the indigenous leadership that was thrown up after Morley-Minto reform [1868] for manning the local councils was of no serious consequence to the Vice regal authority. The police was thus mainly for the removal of conflict between the locals. Criminal activity was adequately covered under the various codes.

Come Pakistan, the police became the main instrument for perpetuation of power. All criticism was to be stifled and the various agencies that were in uniform were to be used for this purpose. The police leadership became uncertain for the sitting incumbents unless and until they were able to deliver what the political or technocrat-political leadership [a euphuism] wanted of them.

Successive governments have ridiculed and pampered the police for the activities that they were supposed to have carried out for the past governments and then have asked them to carry out the same activities for their own perpetuation.

In the current realm a number of activities have indicated how the police are made scapegoats for what has happened due to serious underlying causes. Like the virus that debilitates but seldom kills, political powers and the police have been feeding on each other.

In the last couple of years the brutalization of the people by the police has reached unprecedented heights. A new interface has emerged in which the police have now become involved with not only the sovereign state in action but other sovereign states in action. The Americans, the French and even the New Zealand cricket team have been the targets of this brutalization.

Local actions that have taken place against the people are unprecedented. Freedoms, as generally known and practiced in other parts of the world, are not part of the culture of the Pakistan social scene.

Without going into specific events let there be an assessment of which way the police reform is going. Very early on the government set up a police reforms committee consisting of police officers, retired police officers. They had gone through the system where they had been used by successive governments for their own purpose and objectives. All of them had been Inspector Generals of some sort or the other.

An Inspector general leads a provincial police force [there being four provinces] but there are more than two dozens of them loitering around looking for all kinds of jobs. Some of them landed in the power structure. These police personnel were, and are, very persuasive when it comes to promising loyalty to a current cause. They are also agreeable to taking a secondary position of authority and to thus show themselves as the most agreeable to the power structure.

Evidence for this came when the President saluted them for their zeal and sense of duty during the referendum. For what services they provided in the referendum is another story.

Email story  Email Story | Discuss story Discuss Story

Back to top


 

This Site Is

Innovesia

 

Copyright © 2002 South Asia Tribune Publications, L.L.C. All rights reserved.