| article |
He had no
Choice! |
|
|
|
| A personal perspective on the
suspension of parliament
| |
|
|
My father is a self-made man
and I wish to state this up front that he has
made a conscious effort to never abuse his
influence for personal gain. I say this
unabashedly and as a matter of knowing that he
has a reputation of being thoroughly
professional. My immediate family has made do
with the income of a military officer and there
have been no complaints. There is only relief
that he has made it this far without
compromising his ethics. Both my sister and I
are married and settled in our own lives. Today,
he is the Chief Executive of
Pakistan.
Allama Iqbal, what happened to
his vision? Why don't most Pakistanis understand
his philosophy any longer? Jinnah Sahib, why did
he burn himself out and leave such a bunch of
self serving individuals to govern behind him?
How could we continue a state of misgovernance
for FIFTY-TWO years? Why hasn't there been a
single person who has been able to introduce
fundamental reforms? How long can the teeming
majority of unemployed and impoverished be
ignored? How can we even begin talking about the
'quality' of life, when we fail to address the
fundamental 'sanctity' of life. 'Sanctity' of
life to me being physical well being (law and
order) and healthcare (infant mortality, birth
control, disease control, longevity). 'Quality'
of life being education and higher ideals and
philosophies for society to live and govern
by.
The developing world better prepare
itself for what is about to hit it within the
next decade. They say that 97 percent of the
world economy will be controlled by the
economies geared up for electronic commerce. The
difference between the richest and poorest
nations of the world is said to have been 1:5
two centuries ago but unbridled commercialism
has given rise to a disparity of 1:500. Pretty
soon we'll be dealing with inequities in wealth
and resource distribution of a ratio in the
order of one to thousands times more between the
least developed and most developed economies.
Until the day comes when every Pakistani,
regardless of ethnicity, sex or religion has an
equal opportunity to prosper through hard work,
Pakistan cannot be a dynamic and progressive
country that can stand its ground in the global
competitive markets.
This day was not
envisioned. I never thought there would be such
unanimous consensus within the military, amongst
the people of Pakistan, and amongst the
Pakistanis abroad, behind one cause. The cause
being pure and unadulterated REFORMS! I honestly
feel that what we are witnessing is the
culmination of a collective yearning of the
overwhelming majority of a hundred and fifty
million people. Democracy is an essential ideal,
but let's look into our souls and understand why
it has not taken root. The time has come for
introspection for a fundamental change in state
and society so democracy can actually blossom.
What are the options? Back to a façade
of democracy in the existing political
structure? Satisfying the immediate expectation
of announcing a hand picked portfolio of
technocrats that would form an interim reform
government? Devoting all attention to an across
the board accountability?
Accountability
must take place, and bringing in competent
individuals to key positions is a decision that
should not be taken in haste. Time WILL reveal
the sincerity of purpose of individuals in
question and actions will speak louder than
words to give each of us confidence. I have one
request though, and I would not say this if it
was not absolutely crucial at this time.
Pakistanis, wherever they are abroad, need to
understand that this is a very unique point in
Pakistan's history. We need to make the world
appreciate the context in which the much needed
reforms will be
undertaken.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1104 by GPMWebmaster on
June 10, 2002 6:34pm PT
General Pervez
Musharraf - A New Jinnah In The
Making http://www.GeneralMusharraf.co.uk
|
|
|
#1103 by GPMWebmaster on
June 10, 2002 6:34pm PT
General Pervez
Musharraf - A New Jinnah In The
Making
http://www.GeneralMusharraf.co.uk
|
|
|
#1102 by Unsophisticatus on
June 17, 2001 8:05am PT ahmadb #80
Dear Bilal,
On a serious note, do you think that the
situation in Pakistan is as hopeless and gloomy,
and the politicians/civilians are as corrupt and
inept as Umairr and Ferozk portray them to be?
Umairr #73
I hope you won’t mind me addressing you
directly… I am also one of those interactors with
whom you do not interact voluntarily.
Your statement:
“There are many countries in the third world
that have elections regularly, and remain in the
third world. Elections do not equal democracy.
Democracy involves a lot of other things
also.”
Remaining in the Third World does not mean that
people in those Third World countries don’t live
in relative peace and harmony compared to
Pakistan. A stable Third World country is not so
bad, you know! Small steps… one at a time will do
provided they are in the right direction. Haste
makes waste, and waste makes worry!
Whereas I concur that elections do not equal
democracy, regular elections over a long period of
time (without regular military interventions)
would be a start and a step in the right
direction… Things evolve on this planet. Those
other essentials of democracy you talk about will
slowly make their way into the system once we make
up our mind that democracy is what we want for our
country.
So, here is an alternative for you… regular
elections over a long period of time (say 25
years) “without regular military interventions”…
something Pakistan has not experienced since her
inception! Why not give it a try?
Your statement:
“I think Pakistan is going to need a knight in
shining armor to come in for a few years, and set
up institutions.”
Your argument is fatally flawed. Setting up of
institutions comes under the process of nation
building. Process of nation building cannot be
successful (and hence institutions cannot be
setup) unless an overwhelming majority of
population feels that they are a part of it.
Dictatorship of any sort is the last thing that is
going to achieve the objective of nation
building/setting up of institutions in a country
as diverse, as multi-national and as
multi-cultural as Pakistan. Haven’t we had the
longest period of government under a dictator? How
successful was that?
It is interesting to note that Ferozk wants us
to commit suicide, and you propose Russian
roulette as an alternative -
|
|
|
#1101 by ylh on
May 14, 2001 6:52pm PT Inshallah Pakistan will
be a dynamic and progressive nation.
|
|
|
#1100 by Aisha_Sarwari on
March 27, 2001 2:09pm PT A quote by Bilal
Musharraf form the reply of his Article. “Some
amongst us have a valid concern about how a
‘product’ of the system can be critical of the
system itself. I do feel that what is at play here
is bigger than the position my father is currently
holding and it will play itself out for the
betterment of the country. I am against dwelling
too much on individuals and personalities, so I
would request a move away from it. We should all
submit to higher ideals of social equality and
justice that we all believe in and let actions
speak louder than words. On a personal side note
however, I have faith that my father has the will
and the spirit to see this change through. I think
my father understands the importance of what this
point in time means for Pakistan and its long
awaited overhaul of a decaying colonial system. It
should suffice to say that at this point,
allegiance is to the people of Pakistan and ‘the
system’ is in suspension.”
|
|
|
#1099 by mohajir on
October 25, 2000 1:00am
PT http://www.nation.com.pk/inset.htm
Interview with Pakistani CEO Parvez
Musharraff Q. You claim the final
word.Genetically speaking, are Indians and
Pakistani`s the same? A. I think that they are
very different in many ways. Q. Physically or
character-wise, the two nations are different?
A. I think both ways. Physically and also
character-wise. Q. How many children do you
have? A. Two. A son and daughter. Q. If
your daughter would come and tell you that she
would like to marry an Indian .... a terrific
Indian. "A doctor", Would you object? A. If
it`s a Muslim Indian I wouldn`t. If it`s a Hindu
Indian I would certainly object. Q. You would
object? If she would be willing to marry, let`s
say, a Catholic American, Irish American? A. I
would again object. Q. You requested
international mediation of the UN Aren`t you
concerned that just because of India`s reputation
as a democratic country, ("the greatest democracy
in the world") This mediation will tilt in favour
of India because its a democracy? A. Well, we
have demanded mediation, but mediation does not
mean that we will automatically accept whatever
the mediator concludes even if it is wrongfully
tilting to the other side. We will certainly not
accept it. Q. Do you think that Pakistan, in
general, Pakistani society, treats its minorities
or different ethnic groups better or worse than
India treats it own? A. 200 times better! Q.
200 times better? A. If not more. I`m very sure of
that and this is, again, an unfortunate wrong
perception that Indians create against Pakistan,
of our being not accommodating enough against the
minorities and our having extremist attitudes
towards the minorities. There is nothing farther
than the truth. Q. With the risk of irritating
you, you said a short time ago that you would not
be happy to see your daughter marrying a Catholic
or a non-Muslim. Doesn`t this reflect some kind of
intolerance towards,... A. No, I would beg to
differ. This is not intolerance. I would love to
interact with anybody of any religion and I have
been interacting. I have been abroad and I`ve been
interacting, in fact, let me tell you that when I
was at the Royal College of Defense Studies, I
respected the Israeli officer very much and my
interaction with him and also with his wife was
very pleasant. So I have no intolerance against
any kind of interaction. But when it comes to
marriages that you are talking of, now this is a
totally different issue. There are cultural
differences involved and there are societal
differences involved and therefore that is the
reason when I said that I would not like my
daughter to be married to a Hindu Indian, that
doesn`t mean that I am intolerant. I interacted
very well with the Indian Hindu officer who was
there on the same course. He was my neighbour and
we interacted very well with him. Q. You point
a finger at the media, saying that the media tilts
strongly toward the Indian side? A. Yes.
Certainly. I strongly believe that this is the
case. There are a lot of Indians in the media,
controlling the media and that is the unfortunate
part, they distort facts. Actually perceptions
that are not the reality. Q. You are speaking
about Indians who work as English journalists in
England, and American journalists in America? Are
you claiming that their heart is really with
India? A. First of all there are a lot of Indians
in all places in the international media ....
television, newspaper . Q. Sure. There are
talented Indians. A. These Indians do have
actually an interest themselves, and they also
influence others, those who are around them, those
of other nationalities. Q. A plebiscite was
offered in Kashmir by the United Nations in 1948.
Do you still want it? A. Yes. Certainly. That
is our position. Q. Now, going back to what you
said before, If the results would be pro-India,
would you still accept them? A. Well, I am
more than hundred percent sure that the
(plebiscite-R.L.)results will not be
pro-India. Q. What if the people of Kashmir
will vote for independence? A. There`s no room
for that. They have to vote either for India or
for Pakistan. Q. Kindly mention to me the four
countries that are good friends of Pakistan. A.
Okay. Number one, China. Turkey. Saudi Arabia. Abu
Dhabi. Q. Abu Dhabi is not a very big
country. A. (Here the Pakistani Ambassador
suddenly joins in, and corrects his chief
executive: "UAE, United Arab Emirates, and the
chief executive accepts.) Q. You don`t count
the United States as one. A. Well. Q. I said
"good" friends. A. We have been good friends
but not all that. .. Q. Do you think that the
nuclear weapons now present in both India and
Pakistan make the sub-continent more, or less
secure? A. More secure, I think. Q. The
people of India and Pakistan have shared a history
of several thousand years, shared language, shared
cuisine, music and common culture. Yet, there are
more Muslims remaining in India than there are in
Pakistan. Is that true? A. Population wise, is
this true. I don`t think it is true that India has
more Muslim than we have. But I would like to
comment on the first part when you talked about
our history and our commonality. I do beg to
differ. Our history is totally different. Our
heroes are their villains and vice-versa. Our
culture is absolute the opposite. They consider
cows as their gods. We slaughter cows and eat them
. Q. Didn`t India`s culture stem partly from
the area of what is Pakistan now? A. No. The
Buddhist culture originated from Pakistan. But the
Hindu culture did not originate from
Pakistan. Ranan R. Lurie is a Senior Adjunct
Fellow with the CSIS, The Washington based think
tank, the political cartoonist for FOREIGN AFFAIRS
magazine, and an internationally syndicated
political
analyst/cartoonist http://www.foreignaffairs.org http://www.csis.org
|
|
|
#1098 by Qanungo-one on
May 17, 2000 9:12pm PT
|
|
|
#1097 by Yahmla
Jat on April 13, 2000 1:12am
PT Samarif2000 #1184 Thanks for bringing to
our attention that this board had an objective, a
goal, and focus. It is about B and P.
Musharraf.
Although I can`t even stand the
thought of my country being again ruled by the
armed forces (occupation!), so long as he is where
he rules, I ask him, how about doing small
courtesies to the nation e.g., not throwing
innocent functionaries, students and others behind
bars and subjecting them to torture, and, instead
taking care of situations e.g., what I just heard
on the T.V. That is, automatic-gun men entering a
masjid and indiscriminately firing on the
namazis. Mr. Musharraf, don`t tell me that
these things cannot be controlled, if not, in
fact, completely stopped. May God give you a few
iotas of graymatter. Otherwise, however, you are a
confirmed idiot and a traitor to the nation
anyway.
|
|
|
#1096 by Samarif2000 on
April 6, 2000 3:33pm PT I am sure your father
is a self made man, but please don`t tell me that
he knows all about politics in the region. He is
an army man, a servant of the nation, which I am
sure he has served with great pride and dignity.
Our army is one of a kind, and he has probably
done a great job. However, I see little difference
in him and his cohort, Zia, who is heavily to
blame for the misfortune of Pakistan. Bhutto, and
Sharif, have both had their days whereby they did
everything they could to bring the country to it`s
knees, but I feel that your father too is partly
to blame. The military has no business in running
a nation. He has chosen a man like Javed Jabbar to
advice him; what credentials does he have? His
wife is well known for her drug abuse and drinking
habits, and while the man may be educated, I don`t
think that you can give a man this power solely
based on the fact that you know him personally.
How has your father differed from any other
politician from that region? Pakistan desperately
needs help, and I don`t think the general is
capable enough to provide the country the
stability it needs. You have to admit that
Sharif was tried so "efficiently" because there
was a personal vendetta here...if not then how
come the Zardari case is moving so slowly. He is
solely to blame for the financial ruin of the
country!. Why is no one doing anything to try him?
I am not an ardent fan of any politician in
Pakistan. My own father has suffered enough at the
hands of the Bhutto government, not to mention the
pain our entire immediate family has gone through.
No one holds them responsible, the only one`s
being held responsible are the Sharif`s because
your father felt that he was wronged. I am not
sure that this is the way to run a nation. I think
your father will do the nation a favor the day he
disqualifies the Bhutto`s and the Sharif`s, not to
forget Altaf (the loser) and ensure a safe return
to democracy by making sure that fair elections
are held. I am not sure that in the history of our
nation, a single fair election has ever been
held. Anyhow, you have a reason to be proud of
your father, and his accomplishments, as are most
children of their own fathers. However, when you
have a parent in an obvious position of authority,
you need to also see their faults from the eyes of
the people. I have been in the US for over fifteen
years, with family still in Karachi. I have to say
that I am DISHEARTENED with the plight of the
decent people in that country. I had said to my
parents a long time ago, that in order to live in
Pakistan, comfortably, one can not afford to be
decent, harmless individuals...you need to be
downright unethical, and have no morals at all.
Yet they have proven other wise, although how
comfortable they are mentally can be wisely judged
by the fact that all their children are now
overseas. Regards, Samia Arif
|
|
|
#1095 by SameerJB on
Janauary 4, 2000 1:31am PT Dear Bilal Ahmad
(#1005): It always help to listen (read) to
opposing viewpoints about any issue. In the
article you appended, Abid Ullah Jan has made
several valid points in support of Taliban as
compared to the Tajik/Uzbik alliance they
replaced. If the world community and UN have to
exclude all other factors and only to compare the
Talibans with Rabbani/Hekmatyar government with
respect to selective law and order situation, the
author`s point of view is correct. But actual
situation is much more complex due to Pakistan`s
full support while Russia, Iran and India opposing
coupled with fundamentalist and anti-american
stand of Taliban government are the key factors
for unwillingness of UN to recognize Taliban
government. Those who oppose Tlibans do not
necessarily support the return of Northern
Alliance to power; most individuals and
associations opposing Taliban want better human/
women conditions than prevailing at present. They
believe that Talibans` dogma is contrary to the
basic human rights, especially of
women. Regards, Sameer
|
|
|
| Total pages: 111
(1104 replies) |
|
|
back
| chowk
home |
| | | | |