Issue No 92, May 16-22, 2004 | ISSN:1684-2057 | satribune.com

Click For an Exciting Essay Contest with prize of Half a Million Dollars

 

 

A sweeper sweeps the ground as defeated BJP leaders look on

Rahul, Priyanka Gave Fresh Air to Congress

By Saeed Naqvi

NEW DELHI: Anyone who saw Rahul Gandhi in Varanasi during the campaign knew something qualitatively different from anything witnessed in recent elections had been unleashed. It was not a turnout for a tamasha but a surging mass relieved at the sight of freshness in the midst of putrid politics.

Of course, the Priyanka/Rahul factor during the campaign is not reflected in the UP results. But the scale on which their limited electioneering was amplified by the electronic media had an impact across the length and breadth of the country. If the Congress president had fielded them even six months ago, Congress revival would have been much more substantial.

Congress leaders, somewhat retiring and diffident in recent times, particularly after the defeats in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, had suddenly come alive in the wake of opinion and exit polls. After the tidal wave swept aside Chandrababu Naidu’s much hyped government, Congress leaders at 24 Akbar Road were busy computing their own estimates of the seats the party would win on its own. It must be recorded for posterity that Ambika Soni’s figure was closest to the actual tally.

The Congress victory must not be exaggerated. The party had dipped to 140 seats under P.V. Narasimha Rao’s leadership. Sitaram Kesri in 1998 pulled it up to 141. Then came Sonia Gandhi’s first debacle — under her presidentship the party plummeted to its lowest ever figure, 114 seats. Much of the party’s history since has consisted in vacillating between coalition and isolation.

Sonia’s first impulse to go it alone manifested itself during the party’s Panchmarhi conclave in September 1998. She decided against coalitions because they were not required in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Delhi, going to the polls in November 1998. In these states it was a straight BJP-Congress contest. Her decision made ample sense. Alas, this specific experience was mistaken for a winning strategy in the rest of the country.

By trial and error, she finally decided to knit clever alliances in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Bihar. It is just as well that her quest for alliances in UP did not work out. In UP the Congress has disintegrated into its constituent caste groups — Yadavs, Rajputs and Muslims under Mulayam Singh’s sway and Dalits and Muslims under Mayawati’s spell. Had the Congress allied itself to either party, its revival in UP would have been indefinitely forestalled. And UP has 80 Lok Sabha seats.

The emergence of Priyanka and Rahul in a country where more than half the population is under 30 years has introduced a new charismatic element in electoral politics. In this framework the next round of elections could well bring the Congress back as the national party the country is searching for.

It is just as well that the BJP has made headway in Karnataka and Kerala (in a very tiny way). This has the potential of stabilizing the BJP as another national party with national responsibilities — the direction in which Atal Bihari Vajpayee was leading the party. The voter has told the BJP the kind of party it will not tolerate — the extremist outfit run by Narendra Modi. Those in the BJP already sniping at Vajpayee must deeply ponder the Gujarat verdict.

It is my belief that the BJP would have fared better had Modi-like influences not distorted Vajpayee’s social agenda. The fact that he went against his instincts and made tactical adjustments with the hardliners on Modi at Goa hurt the party. A clear Vajpayee line was distorted.

The problem with a cliche is that it sometimes embodies eternal truths. But because it is a cliche we sometimes throw the baby out with the bath water. The level to which Vajpayee has navigated Indo-Pak relations is not something to be sniffed at. Rahul and Priyanka themselves during the Karachi cricket match witnessed the extraordinary warmth in relations between the people of both countries. They know these relations would have remained mired in the past had Vajpayee not taken all the bold decisions healthy bilateral relations required. To achieve this he had to fight the Modi tendency within the BJP.

Vajpayee could legitimately have a set of complaints against the party. To go for early elections was not his idea. In fact he was constantly citing the occasional inverse equation between assembly and Lok Sabha results. Shining India was also not his brainchild. Selling middle class consumerist dreams to a rural India groaning under unspeakable poverty and worse has recoiled on those who designed the campaign. The Congress counter attack on rising unemployment found an echo with the younger electorate.

A happy addition to national politics is the growth of the Left — gains in Kerala, West Bengal and Andhra Pradesh. The Indian establishment’s knee-jerk anti-Leftism is misplaced as the doctrinaire Left is a thing of the past. Visit China or Vietnam and you’ll be astonished at the practical adjustments Communist parties have made with contemporary economic realities.

Indeed, one lesson of the electoral verdict is that Shining India must be matched by distributive justice, an area in which the Left must not be faulted simply by the apolitical, burgeoning middle class which is out of touch with social realities.

There is occasionally a tendency for a new government to appear to be making departures in all spheres. This can sometimes lead to disaster. The late T.N. Kaul virtually imposed on Indira Gandhi an endorsement of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. This faulty decision was not at all essential for our excellent relations with Moscow in a myriad other ways. The new government also inherits excellent relations with China, the US, Iran, Europe, the Gulf. Plus, a sound economic base.

Sonia must be warned on one count. Her assumption of prime ministership will immediately give a handle to the Modis and their ilk to embark on the “second liberation of India”. This is for her party to ponder. Who knows, embedded in these results may well be the people’s verdict on her foreign origin. Jayalalithaa had made the foreign origin issue the solitary point of her campaign. She has been swept away.

The electorate has in these elections given us a sort of tripod — a Congress with its allies expanding their middle ground, a BJP slowly discarding its defeated Gujarat line and a new Left chiseling away its debilitating dogma. Federal India, in the form of regional parties, proceeds alongside — and the Mulayam Singh/Amar Singh duet emerges all wreathed in smiles. - Indian Express

Email story  Email Story | Discuss story Discuss Story

Back to top

 

Copyright © 2002-04 South Asia Tribune Publications, L.L.C. All rights reserved.