Issue No 21,-Dec 16-22, 2002 | ISSN:1684-2075 | satribune.com


Opinion

 

Please Don't Let the ‘Poodles’ Succeed Once Again

Dr Zafar Altaf

THE WAY present military cum civil set up is desperately trying to bulldoze the political institutions of the country by following dirty tricks to keep PPP away from the governance of Sindh, is distressing to say the least and a cause for concern for those who have some love left for the infant democracy!

Same dirty tricks were to be used against MMA in Balochistan had its leadership not shown some "flexibility".

The ruling elite of politicians are proving the military establishment correct that they cannot live like true democrats and rule the country in the given environment of democracy and thus be discarded.

I really wonder why the present ruling elite is not ready to understand what even a commoner can. Why don’t they realize that such dirty tactics of forcing the shameful defection in political parties would not strengthening their rule. It will not only weaken them but would also help the future ambitious military general to wrap up the entire political set up.

But all know that no one learns from the brutal lessons of history thinking that he or she would manage and maneuver the things for his or her advantage unlike their “stupid” predecessors!
So we have it, a political system in the making. It took a long time to settle the nature and manner of governance. Those that have suffered the sensitivities of this country were relieved that finally the matter has come to an end.

The straw that broke the camel's back in 1946 and that led to the creation of Pakistan was the result of the Punjab elections. Politically the Muslim League had the most votes but intrigue wise the Unionist Party and the Congress could muster enough votes to ensure that they could form a government. It was called a minority coalition and Mr. Khizar Hayat became the Chief Minister. The English realized that in a majority Hindu country the Muslims would never be able to get their rights.

The same thing came to light when the Awami League was not allowed to form a government despite its majority. What it led to is too painful for the sons of this country. When a right or an ostensible right is taken away, the immediate victory is nothing compared to the ultimate loss? The annals of history are full of fair and equitable handling. The process of decay and degeneration need not be with us. We should understand that degeneration and decay could always set in if we do not adhere to age-old principles.

Just go over Yahya Khan’s speeches of the time. Just go over the speeches of some of the people that were involved in that activity. Is it so difficult to reason, is it so difficult to understand that ultimately it is decency that wins out.

The majority parties in Sindh are not in the run for governance. Today’s criminals are always tomorrow’s heroes and vice versa. The matter is so writ.

The result of this ignominious way of thinking and looking over your shoulders is not conducive to survival of this nation. Ultimately individuals are not worthy of anything but contempt. The colonial mind set is with us despite the bravery or the weaknesses of the National Reconstruction Bureau. When losers lead the conceptual reasoning what else do you think can happen? Unreasonable actions, tyranny, treachery and the different cultures bring about societies that ultimately cannot survive.

The lessons can and should be taken from God made things. The body deteriorates with age, so does the body politic and if the baby is still born it deteriorates sooner than later. The body is an unwilling victim of this decay, so is the body politic. Decay is created when there is implied superiority. For once one wishes that there is not this implied superiority and that the will of the people, howsoever exercised or not allowed to be exercised, should be allowed to prevail.

The aristocracy that is in Pakistan must understand this. That to every servile policy there is an alternative and there are alternatives ad infinitum. In India our legacy has been that five hundred of them with a small number of people in the garrison ruled this country for over two fifty years. Do we allow this inconspicuous way of doing things. Is Aurangzeb’s legacy desirable; is the British legacy desirable? And the more one asks these questions the more one finds chinks in the armor. Clive was a clerk and heaven forbid that we should have more Clives from the counting houses?

We need to understand that the Balochistan and the Sindh saga will not work if there is this hidden hand. This hidden hand is there. The aristocracy that is developed through a connected handing system does not respond to these facts as they should? The British did the same. They handed lands and assets to the people of this country and created a culture of ‘poodalism’ in which the person gaining the advantage was forever grateful to the tyrant. Land was given to the persons for going as far as the eye can see or the distance that one traveled in a day, from sunrise to sunset. Are assets still given on meaningless basis? Are the modern capital markets worth their salt? Are the scions of the political system capable of looking at themselves and determining their warts and all?

There are so many advisors going around and so many ways of keeping influence going that it boggles the mind. All one has to do is to see how the people are visiting other people and what is the nature of the political and social stroke play. The social confetti that is thrown around the people so that they become part of the seedy system. The Parsi industrialist of the British Raj has given way to our kinds of nefariously connected industrialist. Papanek’s [advisor to the Ayub government] way of saying that it takes only 100 robber barons to develop a country. He forgot a few things. It seems that Papanek is still alive and well in Pakistan and may have some of his protégés in positions of power. Development is secondary. What is primary is the creation of politically powerful people.

When legacies of this kind are available one becomes subject to a slave mentality. Keep the one man happy and do as you want to do. The silent manner of doing things by the powerful comes out eventually. By that time the consequential actions become irreversible. The limb is chopped off. The misallocation of resources is exacerbated and a poor country becomes poorer still with no way out but to toe the line or face the consequences of incarceration. Pregnant women get beaten up by officialdom in officialdom’s places and manhood takes a soaring dive.

The long hard drive to civil rule will be obstructed by those who have been set up in the social system for whatever disruptions they can cause thus making the body decay before its time. At the end the danger is that the abusively powerful will say ‘I told you so.’ The ‘I told you so’ philosophy is akin to the tadpole philosophy. The tadpole keeps on wagging its tale and does not do much more. The greater the danger the more vigorous the wag.

Are we as Pakistanis subject to this conspicuously inconspicuous governance? All the time the surgery that is made on the system throws away the brain but keeps the tumor intact. The danger of an invisible, faceless and remote rule leads one to believe that there will be a continuous sapping of national unity or even the sense of national unity leading one to believe that the whole people would remain powerless for ages. The benefit of the few would be remorselessly strengthened and the ‘poodles’ gain significantly.

Please do not let the ‘poodles’ win? Our current dreams are of doing away with obsolete systems and seek new dimensions and new paradigms. Not reinforce the old and obsolete ones. The gains from derived intrigues are not sustainable. The worship of and continuous slavery to a source is easy to identify. It comes out in understandable proxies. I look for these proxies in the paper. A cement dealer has given his ways of selling through hard work and now derives his income by committing dacoity on his former colleagues. Meantime the oath of office is the oath of sanctity. That enjoins that one believes in keeping that oath in letter and spirit. Although it was collectively taken [?] it has sanctity and a spirit behind it. I can only say that the only persons I found even remotely conscious of this were the MMA. They had already taken an oath of true allegiance to a much higher and powerful God. They have a commitment to a higher form. The governance of NWFP will be a major source of interest so far as governance is concerned.

And should Pakistanis shoulder the responsibility of inconsequential actions of those in power like that of Yahya Khan and this is what some one wrote of him ‘Like all senior people he was blind to the true state of affairs.’ Sorry I lied for I have not given the true version for it is too painful for me and I would leave that part as a crime of omission but was the Pakistani nation guilty of criminal neglect and were they guilty of other misdemeanors? How after all will you get your guilt away? I have yet to do so. So beware, for you have allowed this thing to happen too often and the result is that you are not part of the civil society.

Those holders of scepters and swords and those Cardinal Wolseley’s who have served their masters more and better than their Lord should look at their own actions and feel a little remorse and try washing off the stains of despotism. All those who have used the instruments of government for their nefarious ends need to be made accountable. But where and how? Who will do it? The hangman cannot hang himself and neither can jurisprudence for we have people sitting in authority over their own case. Calling every one every conceivable thing and doing much better for themselves. Self service for you.

Are we then to become a nation of shifting sands? The choice is of all Pakistanis and no sacrifice should be considered inconsequential. Instant coffee is all right but instant obedience is not. Please savor your dialogues and your reasoning as well as that of the other. Feudal everywhere and in every form behave. It is time to take stock of the ones that have been collaborators. We may not have Nuremberg style trials but it is necessary to take the cancer out of the body. Dryden did say ‘It is time to start anew.’ Good health and good reasoning be your mandate.

So, time has come for the politicians to get some maturity. Please have mercy on the infant democracy and let the vulnerable opposition political parties survive as people have suffered a lot during the last three years of military regime and they need a break now. Otherwise, soon yet another energetic general will be knocking on the doors!

The writer has been a Federal Secretary, Government of Pakistan

Back to top

 

 

Site Credits: DA, Inc.

Copyright © 2002 South Asia Tribune Publications, L.L.C. All rights reserved.