Issue No 6, Aug 26-Sep 1, 2002 | ISSN:1684-2075 | satribune.com


Opinion

Was Arundhati Roy talking to herself?

Mohammad Shehzad

Arundhati Roy's lecture in Islamabad has proved one thing-i.e. just like a section of our print media, a segment of our civil society is also driven blindly by the state-manufactured anti-India biases and prejudices, and the two are completely alien to "common sense". And to expect, they would ever behave responsibly is like (as Sheikh Sa'adi puts) washing a black person 24-hours with a soap to make his skin white.

Arun, a peace/environment activist and the author of The God of Small Things (which won the Booker Prize in 1997 and sold six million copies, and has been translated into 40 languages) was in Pakistan on Aug 14, along with two leading Indian journalists, Shekhar Gupta (Editor-in-Chief, Indian Express) and N. Ram (Editor, Frontline, one of the publications of The Hindu Group of newspapers). They were invited to speak at a series of seminars on Peace and Freedom, in Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi, arranged by the Daily Times. Arun was the keynote speaker. Her oratory made many of us run into tears, when she said: "Making nuclear bombs is like challenging the God's authority!"

Arun excoriated the Indian government in Pakistan. Her powerful speech received a standing ovation. She did not have a cup of tea after the seminar. She was surrounded by her aficionados. Almost everyone had bought her novel, which was on display at the occasion. They wanted to have her John Hancock, and have a photograph with her, including the star India hater, General Hamid Gul, the former head honcho of the ISI, who never clapped, never budged during her soul-stirring harangue. What would he use the picture for? May be to tell his followers to hate this lady.

"Don't you think she has been beating around the bush? Why can't she speak about the UN resolutions on Kashmir! She is a hypocrite like all the Hindus!" a senior journalist of a leading Urdu newspaper said to me at the tea. I later found him chasing Arun for a photograph/ autograph!

In half Urdu and half English, a female development "expert" remarked: "Yeh sub to drama tha. (This was an eyewash!) You know! She was full of herself. Yeh apni hee tareef kar raheen thee. (She has been praising herself.) The entire Islamabad knows, this lady is extremely self-centered. She attends all the functions and bribes the photographers for her pictures in the newspapers. A friend told me that she had paid him 1000 rupees for a close-up with Arundhati Roy.

"Her lecture was profusely sugar coated. Indians are really expert at playing up with the words," remarked a state-certified "intellectual" who is the darling of the Pakistan Television. Yet he and his entire family was after Arun for autographs!

"She does not know the ABC of politics and pretends to be a political pundit. She tried to impress us with her philosophical style and emotions," opined a retired bureaucrat whose visiting card carried an additional title-"Political Analyst"-besides a plethora of other titles. This self-proclaimed analyst was praising Arun to the skies to have an exclusive photo session with her!

"She has totally ignored Medha Patkar's contribution. (Pathkar is the leading activist of the Narmada Bachao Andolan). She has taken the entire credit. This is intellectual corruption!" said a social scientist. His point was valid but he did not raise it during the question/answer session. Like others, he too was hovering around Arun!

Arun was lampooned and lambasted by a section of the print media who claims to be the "proprietor" of Islam, ideology of Pakistan and the two-nation theory. One of the leading English dailies wrote, Arun was a representative of the poor Indians in Hindustan. But in Pakistan she was addressing the elite who were not sincere in serving the humanity and were the root-causes of its conundrums! Quite interestingly, the statement was self-contradictory. Arun was here to motivate the elite to work for the poor-not to urge the poor to work for the betterment of the elite! She has donated a significant portion of her income for the cause of environment, peace and the poor. Her life proves that a serious and committed elite can effectively fight for the rights of the poor. We have a living example of it. When Zafran Bibi was awarded death sentence by stoning under the notorious Hudood laws, the elite of our society staged demos and rallies. The elite was baton-charged and arrested. No jihadi organization, no religious leader condemned it. It was the elite whose voice was heard and Zafran Bibi was acquitted.

It was Abid Hassan Minto, a representative of the elite who fought Ayub Masih's case and convinced the apex court to repeal his death sentence that was awarded to him under the draconian blasphemy law.

Flaying Arun's presence in Pakistan an Urdu newspaper wrote: "Arundhati Roy can raise her voice for a few Muslims who were killed in the Gujrat riots. It is shameful she has no position on Kashmir. She presumes to be a very sensitive writer but in fact she is very cunning and callous. She knew she won't be able to defend India's Kashmir policy, therefore, she refused to take any stance on it. We will respect her as a genuine writer, when she will launch a campaign for the Kashmir cause!"

It is ironic a section of our press can't think of any other issue except Kashmir which is linked to every Indian whether he/she is concerned with it or not. How many of our elite writers/analysts/speakers/commentators taken positions on issues like Can't it appreciate a few ground realities e.g. Arun, Gupta and Ram strongly criticized their government in a country that is considered an enemy! And the Indian establishment tolerates such criticism. In 1998, Najam Sethi criticized the Pakistani establishment in India. He had to pay a very heavy price upon return. We all know what happened to him, despite the fact what he had said in India, he had already editorialized it in his weekly publication.

The dilemma is that a large section of our print media is void of objectivity and regard for the truth. It has branded great personalities like Pervez Hoodbhoy, Asma Jehangir, etc., as "anti-Pakistan" and "traitor". It provides enormous space to jihadis and ill-educated maulvis to spit venom against anyone who speaks the truth. It does not propagate competition with India on fronts such as free education, good quality higher education, democracy, press freedom, strong judiciary, good governance, etc. It is unable to think of anything except Kashmir and India.

There is, however, something to commend. When this scribe asked Aziz Ahmed Khan, the Foreign Office spokesman to comment on the speeches of the Indian guests, he said: "The Government of Pakistan welcomes the eminent Indian journalists and intellectuals. Their message is peace. We also want peace. Therefore, we welcome them!" It is true. Mr Khan really welcomed them.

The writer is a freelance journalist based in Islamabad. Email: rageshri2@yahoo.com

Email story  Email Story | Discuss story Discuss Story

Back to top

 

Site Credits: DA, Inc.

Copyright © 2002 South Asia Tribune Publications, L.L.C. All rights reserved.